Market Update
Who’s on First? What is on Second?
For a moment, forget everything you know about tariffs.
Imagine you are a country with a new industry (let’s say you want to begin producing cars), and you want to protect that industry. You believe this industry is going to be very important to your country, but you also know that your neighboring countries are much better at producing cars right now. So, you have three main choices:
You could let the market dictate the outcomes.
You could limit the number of cars that come into your country.
You could add a slight tax for the cars that come into your country.
That’s it, ladies and gentlemen, you now understand all fundamentals of foreign trade: (1) is known as free trade; (2) is known as quotas; and (3) is known as tariffs—fancy names for some fairly basic objectives.
Tariffs aren’t inherently “bad” or “good.” They’re just a tool. They simply change the incentives of the various trade partners, producers, and consumers.
So, my dear reader will quickly ask, “why do we care, and why are markets in the midst of a small tantrum?” Well, let us continue with this example for a moment and add some numbers…
Let’s imagine there are two countries: Country 1 and Country 2.
Country 1 (for example, Germany) manufactures cars and sells them to Country 2 (for example, the United States). Each car costs $20,000 when imported into Country 2. And the car sells for $25,000.
Unfortunately, Country 2 doesn’t like this arrangement and decides to impose a 25% tariff on cars imported from Country 1. This means an additional $5,000 is added to the price for the importing company in Country 2.
So, let’s recap. Before the tariff on cars, the importing company in Country 2 paid $20,000 per car. Now, after the tariff, the importing company must pay $25,000 per car and decide how much to charge consumers.
What’s hopefully clear with this simple example is that tariffs aren’t good or bad, they are simply a tool. And to be clear, that tool can have important implications…
The importing company can now either a) absorb the cost (which reduces its profit), or b) pass the cost onto consumers in Country 2 through higher prices.
While different industries treat this in a variety of ways, most of the time the costs are passed onto the consumer.
Clear so far?
Tariffs, Tantrums, and Trade Turmoil
With the mastery of tariffs knowledge you now possess, here’s the play by play:
Jan. 14: President-elect Trump announces plans to create the External Revenue Service to manage tariffs and duties from foreign sources. He plans to establish this agency on Jan. 20, upon taking office for his second term.
Jan. 26: The U.S. avoids a trade war with Colombia after the country agrees to accept military aircraft carrying deported migrants. Trump had previously threatened tariffs and sanctions due to Colombia's initial refusal.
Feb. 1: Trump declares a national emergency over illegal immigration and drug trafficking, including fentanyl. He imposes:
25% tariffs on imports from Canada and Mexico
10% tariffs on imports from China
10% tariffs on Canadian energy resources
Feb. 3: Trump delays the newly announced 25% tariffs on Canada and Mexico for one month after both countries agree to enhance border security.
Feb. 7: Trump postpones tariffs on low-cost (de minimis) packages from China until the Commerce Department ensures systems are in place to process packages and collect revenue.
Feb. 10: Trump says he will postpone a 25% tariff on steel and aluminum imports.
March 4: The Trump administration enacts previously delayed tariffs on Canada and Mexico, imposing a 25% levy on all imports from both nations. The president also adds an additional 10% tariff on all imports from China.
March 6: Trump pauses many tariffs on Canada and Mexico for one month, but only goods covered under the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) are exempted from tariffs.
March 12 (expected): The Trump administration plans to impose a 25% tariff on all steel imports and raise the original 10% tariffs on aluminum imports to match the 25% duty on steel.
Confused yet? Well, yes, so are we, and candidly so are markets. Which brings us to Chart 1:
While precise attribution is always difficult, the market clearly has not liked the uncertainty around tariffs (see red oval above). Each time a new tariff is announced, the market sells off, and each time a tariff has been put on hold, cancelled, or reduced, the market has moved higher.
Which makes sense. Tariffs, as we have seen with our simple example, generally raise costs. Costs going higher are, all things being equal, a) bad for growth, and b) bad for our continued quest to control inflation.
Does that mean this latest round of announcements will send the U.S. economy into a tailspin? No, I don’t believe so, but we can confidently state that markets dislike uncertainty, and uncertainty is rising. Will our trade partners retaliate? Is this simply a negotiating tactic? No one truly knows…but given how chaotic the announcements have been, markets have become…understandably nervous.
Duty Today, Gone Tomorrow
With that out of the way, let us now turn to a little perspective to bring us home.
The first point is that as long as there has been trade, there have been tariffs. And we’ve always survived.
Some of the more notable examples:
The Tariff Act of 1789 was one of the first major acts of Congress. It used tariffs as the primary source of federal revenue and protection for emerging American industries.
The Tariff of Abominations (1828) imposed high duties on imports. While it benefited Northern industries, it negatively impacted Southern economies.
The Morrill Tariff (1861), passed just before the Civil War, increased rates to protect Northern manufacturers and fund the Union war effort. There are some fascinating stories from this…in case my dear reader is so inclined.
Smoot-Hawley Tariff (1930) was intended to protect American farmers and industries during the Great Depression.
There were also the Dingley Tariffs, the Underwood Tariffs, and the infamous McKinley Tariffs. While many of these made more sense when the U.S. was younger and had brand-new industries to protect, policymakers have continued to rely on them throughout the years.
And with that walk down memory lane out of the way, let us therefore summarize what we have learned:
Tariffs are not inherently bad or good; they are just a tool.
Tariffs at the margin, raise costs and will generally slow growth.
Tariffs have been used throughout U.S. history.
Markets are particularly uneasy right now about the high level of trade uncertainty.
And yet…
Capital markets, as they exist, are reflections of capitalism and the principles therein. And those principles remain in effect. Over the short term, the chaos we humans create causes markets to move higher and lower and do so in a wildly confusing and impossible-to-predict manner but, in the long-run, those principles drive investment returns. Savers are incentivized to provide their capital to productive companies for productive purposes and, in exchange, those savers receive a return on (and of) their capital.
In the short term, ladies and gentlemen, expect bumpiness. The changes being discussed are certainly unorthodox and, while we are watching closely, how this all nets out in the near term is impossible to predict.
We remain confident that capital markets, over reasonable time periods, will continue to generate returns above inflation. This is the foundation of wealth creation, and tariffs won't alter these fundamental principles.
We remain at your service and watching closely.
Authored by:
Daken J. Vanderburg, CFA
Chief Investment Officer
MassMutual Wealth Management
[2] Source: Bloomberg, WMIT, through Aug. 20, 2024
Use of political figures or statements is solely for reference and relevance to financial markets and is not meant to be an endorsement or a reflection of the company’s opinion or position.
Asset allocation does not guarantee a profit or protect against loss in declining markets. There is no guarantee that a diversified portfolio will outperform a non-diversified portfolio or that diversification among asset classes will reduce risk.
This material does not constitute a recommendation to engage in or refrain from a particular course of action. The information within has not been tailored for any individual. The opinions expressed herein are those of Daken J. Vanderburg, CFA as of the date of writing and are subject to change. MassMutual Private Wealth & Trust, FSB (MassMutual Trust) and MML Investors Services provide this article for informational purposes, and does not make any representations as to the accuracy or effectiveness of its content or recommendations. Mr. Vanderburg is an employee of MassMutual Trust and MML Investors Services, and any comments, opinions or facts listed are those of Mr. Vanderburg. MassMutual Trust and MML Investors Services, LLC (MMLIS) are subsidiaries of Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company (MassMutual).
This commentary is brought to you courtesy of MassMutual Trust and MML Investors Services, LLC (Member FINRA, Member SIPC). Past performance is not indicative of future performance. An index is unmanaged and one cannot invest directly in an index. Material discussed is meant for informational purposes only and it is not to be construed as specific tax, legal, or investment advice. Although the information has been gathered from sources believed to be reliable, it is not guaranteed. Please note that individual situations can vary, therefore, the information should be relied upon when coordinated with individual professional advice. Clients must rely upon his or her own financial professional before making decisions with respect to these matters. This material may contain forward looking statements that are subject to certain risks and uncertainties. Actual results, performance, or achievements may differ materially from those expressed or implied.
MassMutual Wealth Management is a business line of MassMutual. Securities, investment advisory, and wealth management services offered through MML Investors Services, LLC member SIPC, and a MassMutual subsidiary. 1295 State Street, Springfield, MA 01111-0001
Cadence Financial Management is not a subsidiary or affiliate of MML Investors Services, LLC or its affiliated companies.
©2025 Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company, Springfield, MA 01111-0001 All Rights Reserved. www.massmutual.com
MM202803-311878